8 Reasons Brock Lesnar Must Retire The Undertaker At WWE Hell In A Cell

8. Brock Lesnar's Dominance Needs To Be Re-Established

Having Seth Rollins pin Roman Reigns when he cashed in at WrestleMania was a smart move as it obviously protected Lesnar and kept him an undefeated and unstoppable Beast who had his title stolen from him. Since then however, he hasn't really been given a chance to show that off. His rematch with Rollins barely got off the ground thanks to The Undertaker, he predictably destroyed Kofi Kingston in Japan, and looked far too vulnerable when facing The Big Show in Madison Square Garden, a "giant" we've all grown used to seeing lose on a weekly basis to the likes of Ryback and Kane. All that aside, Lesnar didn't suffer too much from his loss at SummerSlam, as if anyone should be depicted as being on his level, it's the Phenom (even if the age difference does that make that a little daft). However, there's no denying that he's lost some of his mystique as a result, and another loss to The Undertaker could take Lesnar back to where he was before conquering The Streak. He'll still be a formidable opponent and a serious threat, but his appearance won't be anywhere near as fun or must-watch as the period in which he tore through opponents like John Cena, Roman Reigns, and Seth Rollins. Definitively beating The Undertaker and bringing an end to his career puts Lesnar on a whole other level, something which would make the choice of his next opponent even more exciting - after all, who could stop the man responsible for killing The Deadman? - and a huge boost to the career of the one who finally slays The Beast.