12 Supposedly Unfilmable Films That Actually Got Made

9. The Lord Of The Rings (2001-2003)

Why It Was 'Unfilmable': The fantasy epic against which all other fantasy epics are measured, The Lord of the Rings trilogy of books by J.R.R. Tolkien is a sweeping, mythical troika with a large cast of characters and a detailed intrinsic history spread across every page. Putting such a trilogy onto film would require great financial input and a cast and crew of hundreds, maybe thousands. But with dozens of different magical races and their many tribes, dense backstories, whole invented languages and a varied ecosystem ranging from snowy mountain ranges to hellish volcanic kingdoms, it seemed no amount of money would ever really do justice to Middle-Earth. How It Got Made: After the studio gave a $281 million budget to the largely untested (in the field of major blockbusters, anyway) Peter Jackson, and the screenplays for all three films had boiled Tolkien's story down into a more manageable narrative, Jackson went to work. Filming took more than a year, production starting in October 1999 and finally ending in December 2000. The real coup - aside from nailing the difficult casting - was the location Jackson chose to stand in for Middle-Earth: his native New Zealand. A largely untouched land with its own diverse geography, filming everything in New Zealand allowed Jackson to film for much cheaper than the usual blockbuster. Innovative, state-of-the-art CGI then filled in the gaps and recreated the worlds of Tolkien almost seamlessly.
In this post: 
Watchmen
 
First Posted On: 
Contributor
Contributor

Lover of film, writer of words, pretentious beyond belief. Thinks Scorsese and Kubrick are the kings of cinema, but PT Anderson and David Fincher are the dashing young princes. Follow Brogan on twitter if you can take shameless self-promotion: @BroganMorris1