5 Reviews Roger Ebert Got Horribly Wrong
The film world was left in mourning today with the loss of Roger Ebert, easily the planet's most respected and well-known film critic, passing away after a long battle with cancer at the age of 70. He was a figure of inspiration for many journalists wanting to get into the industry (myself included; from a young age I'd read his reviews every week without fail), and had that uncanny ability to completely enthrall you with his reasoned wit even when you didn't agree with his opinions. That is the sign of a great critic, and unsurprisingly as a result, Ebert is distinguished as the first film critic to win a Pullitzer Prize. The respect held for him is evident from the outpour of tributes from figures as prominent as Steven Spielberg and Barack Obama. It's a testament to the man's stature and talent that we'd even consider looking at the controversial times the critic went against the tide, and it was certainly something he wasn't afraid to do. Ebert was famously called out for his 3-star (out of 4) review of Paul Blart: Mall Cop for instance, but each time he stood by his work and would often even continue the discourse with fans on his website. Every so often, he would re-visit a film and find his opinion changed - he re-reviewed Vincent Gallo's The Brown Bunny once it was re-edited after Cannes and gave it a positive notice - demonstrating his humility in the course of providing us with the most intelligent and thoughtful film criticism on the net or in print. Here are 5 of Ebert's most contentious reviews, 5 that go totally against the grain, and yet still manage to be fascinating reads all in of themselves. Whether we agreed with you all the time or not, we'll miss youa Hell of a lot, Roger...