8 Reasons Mission Impossible Is Better Than James Bond

1. Mission Impossible Has A Better Protagonist

One of the reasons that M:I€™s action works so well is the nature of the man who€™s in the midst of all the excitement. The crucial thing is this: Ethan Hunt does not want to climb the Burj. You can tell that he€™d rather be anyplace else. While engaging in or running away from violence, Hunt€™s eyes bug out and his jaw trembles. Put this together with the hilarious way Hunt has of running, and it€™s like Tom Cruise is clowning or channeling Wile E. Coyote. Hunt is a stupidly brave yet reluctant human being thrust into the role of superspy. He loves his wife and he treasures his team. Hunt is a sympathetic hero through and through. The Craig Bond films acknowledge that Bond does not care about killing, or for the most part about anyone in his life. He is praised and insulted as a €œblunt instrument.€ And yes, he wouldn€™t be good at his job if he minded killing. Sure. But a character that spends a film not minding what he€™s doing doesn€™t make an involving story. The most you get out of Bond while he€™s running around cutting people down is a raised eyebrow and a jiggling cheek. Bond doesn€™t care about what€™s happening, so neither do I. Though the Bond films have teased out some of his flaws and truer feelings through interactions with Vesper and €œM,€ the character just spends too much time in default mode to stay interesting. As always, this thing comes down to taste. I like my heroes a bit more vulnerable. I like Ethan Hunt because he grumbles and whines, because he looks so peculiar in motion, and because he so obviously cares.
Contributor

Nathan Hastings hasn't written a bio just yet, but if they had... it would appear here.