Daniel Craig: 5 Awesome Performances And 5 That Sucked

4. John Ballard - Elizabeth

No relation to futuristic pessimist J.G., John Ballard is an emissary sent by the Pope to give Elizabeth a good shoeing direct from God. So, he€™s a religious nutter who loves a good bit of murdering, which sounds quite good; it€™s just that he€™s superviolent to the exclusion of having any other characteristics. That said, this role was his first chance to get in amongst a gifted ensemble cast, which in this case featured Blanchett, Gielgud, Attenborough, Rush, and Eccleston among others.This was a big event film after five years of either TV work or arthouse flicks, so perhaps his willingness to just go along with it was borne out of a sense of getting up another rung on the ladder. He€™s also only in three scenes and so it€™s understandably quite tricky to get much in the way of nuance during such a tight timeframe, but all he really does is walk quite purposefully along dark passageways before either stoving someone€™s head in or swooping into a chancel. This role did at least serve some notice of Craig€™s skills when it comes to a juicy torture scene; he really takes a convincing battering. However, it€™s a mark of how little room the role gives for extemporisation that it€™s genuinely really hard to give a toss as to whether he gets disembowelled, stretched on the rack, or just made to watch The Invasion again.
Contributor
Contributor

Holding midfielder; can get forward. Decent engine.