Edinburgh Film Festival 2011 Review: TOMBOY

rating: 3.5

Laure, the protagonist of Céline Sciamma€™s Tomboy, doesn€™t like make-up, or dresses, or long hair; not on herself, anyway. She keeps her hair cut short and likes to play football. She€™s also ten years old, on the cusp of adolescence and forming a crush on a local girl. She has just moved into a new neighbourhood and no one knows her, and since she€™s already fairly androgynous she starts passing herself off as a boy, Mikael. Armed with her new identity (and, in one scene, a Play-Doh phallus), she ingratiates herself with some local boys, and even kisses the girl she likes following a game of truth or dare. She looks and acts like a boy, so no one doubts her. However the new school term is approaching, and she realises that she has painted herself somewhat into a corner. This is not, however, a movie about someone discovering she is gay, or transgender. It€™s more specific in its viewpoint. Laure likes being Mikael; she has affinity for all the things she€™s told are feminine, and she likes her new (mainly male) friends. She likes the fact that Lisa, the local girl, likes Mikael; even has a crush on him. At one point Lisa applies make-up to Laure/Mikael€™s face, and says €˜You look great as a girl€™ €“ but, naturally, she thinks of €˜as a girl€™ and €˜in make-up€™ as virtually synonymous. Girls passing as boys is not new, of course. There was Boys Don€™t Cry. And Shakespeare. What makes this movie interesting is in the way it shows a child who has not come to terms with his or her identity trying to live in a way that makes them comfortable while everyone else is acutely aware of the vulnerability surrounding such a seemingly innocent decision. Laure€™s parents are loving and even somewhat understanding, but they also know what she€™ll come in for when school starts (or puberty hits). The children she befriends are fairly typical; they too have a degree of innocence, but they also have a lack of understanding and ingrained hostility towards anything that transgresses their notions about gender. The central role is played by Zoé Héran, and she€™s excellent; even people with very short patience for child actors will be impressed. The rest of the cast offers strong support. The direction, from Sciamma, is confident, as is the photography. Script-wise it€™s less than perfect; it€™s a little slow in places. Perhaps a more lyrical edge was needed to bring us into the world of this child. But at least we aren€™t given reductive explanations or motivations; at no point do you feel like you€™re being forced a point of view, and the film is incredibly even-handed about the other characters. All sorts of people have all sorts of opinions about sex and gender. I think the movie is fairly open-minded. It doesn€™t judge its characters €“ not Laure; not her family; not the other kids €“ and is without dramatic contrivance. Its slow pace and intimacy might make it a hard sell for many people, but I found it engaging. Towards the end we see that Laure€™s mother has given birth to a baby. I think they say earlier that it€™s a boy, but I can€™t remember, and I didn€™t want to. Whatever its biological sex, it doesn€™t have a gender yet.
Contributor
Contributor

I've been a film geek since childhood, and am yet to find a cure. Not an auteurist, but my favourite directors include Robert Altman, Ernst Lubitsch, Welles, Hitch and Kurosawa. I also love Powell & Pressburger movies, anything with Fred Astaire, Cary Grant or Katherine Hepburn, the space-ballet of 2001, Ealing comedies, subversive genre cinema and that bit in The Producers with the fountain.