Star Trek Into Darkness: 7 Reasons Why It's Underwhelming

2. Star Trek Into Fanboyism

star trek into darkness It€™s no secret that JJ Abrams isn€™t a Trekkie, but what you might not know is that his writing staff are diehard Trekkies (your mileage may vary with Lindelof). The last movie did have some neat little references to past Trek installments, but Star Trek into Darkness takes it to a whole new extreme. The entire story is constructed out of Star Trek references, along with all the visual ones throughout the movie. Carol Marcus, Khan, and the final act lifting a lot of material from The Wrath of Khan are the obvious examples, but that€™s only scratching the surface. There€™s Deep Space 9 references in the plot (Section 31 and the Ketha province where Khan hides); The Motion Picture inspired some of the costumes (the admiral uniforms and McCoy€™s medical one where he€™s working on the tribble), while the ship Kirk and company use on Qo€™nos is made by a race that cameo€™d in that film; models of various Trek ships like the Pheonix, NX-01, and NX-Alpha in Admiral Marcus€™ office; redshirt jokes; and many more. In most cases, there aren€™t any real problems to having a lot of references besides pacing them out to keep the audience from hating them. But with Star Trek into Darkness, the sheer amount of references screams of writers desperately shouting €œThis really is Star Trek!€ It€™s as if the writers heard the criticism from diehard Trekkies about the previous movie basically tossing all of Trek continuity out and decided to stuff this film full of references to get them to like it. That€™s not how you get people to like something €“ crafting a high quality piece that does its job well is the way to bring those people around.
Contributor
Contributor

Living in Florida, enjoying the weather when its good, writing for a living. TV, Film, Animation, and Games are my life blood. Follow me on Twitter @xbsaint. Just try not to get too mad when I live tweet during Toonami.