1: Versus
Umm I do not know about you but despite containing well executed and admirable ambitions to create more sympathetic stories instead of nonstop action, the action sequences themselves differ from their respective franchises. . Man of Steel is balls to the wall chaos that made Michael Bay have an orgasm somewhere while Nolans Dark Knight Trilogy leaned towards reality and stealth. There were some destructive sequences but incomparable to Man of Steel. Man of Steel was a film where Superman nearly executed his finishing maneuver from the video game Injustice; Gods Among Us which depicts Superman punching his opponent into space and clobbering them back down to Earth on the head. The most exciting action sequence in Nolans Dark Knight Trilogy was either a tense citywide chase around Gotham with Joker or Bane infamously breaking the Bats back in a near identical panel for panel comic adaptation. The action sequences in these universes vary greatly that can realistically probably only be remedied by Snyder bringing in Kryptonite Either that or Batman gets his hide whipped in one deflating battle before they immediately and inevitably team up afterwards to tackle a villain who like everything else about this film, will be underwhelming and cast to the side in favor of more Batman. So there you have it. I have thought past the initial shellshock of two iconic heroes sharing the same screen and have ultimately come to the conclusion that it is a stupid idea for now. Agree or disagree? Let me know in the comments!