The Invisible Man Review: 8 Ups & 2 Downs

1. It's A Rare Reboot That REALLY Works

The Invisible Man Elisabeth Moss
Universal Pictures

With this movie unexpectedly turning out as well as it did, it's hilarious to consider that Universal very nearly made a larger-budget, Johnny Depp-starring Invisible Man movie a few years ago, as was set to be part of the studio's planned (and quickly cancelled) Dark Universe.

Rather than a $200 million slice of star-studded schlock, we ended up with a thoughtful, modest, and brilliantly acted film which, if nothing else, proves the triumph of a filmmaker's imagination over the "need" for executives to line their pockets from cynical tentpole froth.

Yet with this take on The Invisible Man tracking to be a stonking box office hit, it looks like a win-win for everyone involved, while indicating to studios that they needn't risk monstrous budgets to revitalise beloved IP.

Advertisement

Watch Next


Contributor
Contributor

Stay at home dad who spends as much time teaching his kids the merits of Martin Scorsese as possible (against the missus' wishes). General video game, TV and film nut. Occasional sports fan. Full time loon.