Getting a WWE Superstar's rating right is an unenviable task for 2K in their video games. This is because WWE is a machine that never stands still, it's a machine that is constantly moving and requires different cogs to get from one point to another. These cogs - the Superstars - are constantly changing in importance through the process of creative and storylines. As Piers Morgan's Twitter bio reads, "One day you're the cock of the walk, the next a feather duster." Never has a truer word been said in terms of WWE and how their product works. One minute you could be on top, the next you're down in the dumps with the rotting corpses on Superstars. Just look at Jack Swagger as an example of this in action... From World Heavyweight Champion to nothingness in a few short years. The former All-American, American has found himself rated as high as 89 in WWE games, but even though he's still up there in this year's game with a rating of 85, even he would have to concede he lucky to have that due to the way he's been booked in recent times. What I'm trying to say here is that the ratings in wrestling games in general aren't based on skill or prowess in the ring, they're based on how a Superstar is being booked at the time of development. If you're being pushed around WrestleMania season, you're in for a very pretty looking year in the virtual WWE Universe of their video games. Here's 10 Superstars who are criminally under-rated in WWE 2K16.
