Metallica: Ranking Their Post-Black Album Work
Metallica's more recent output has certainly been divisive, but which post-Black album is the best?
When Metallicas eponymously titled fifth studio album hit shelves on Aug. 12, 1991, fans, critics, and even the bands Thrash metal brethren felt an instantaneous sense of betrayal. The pointed snarl and metal-up-your-a** belligerence that had come to define their sound during the mid-1980s had been transformed into mainstream merchandise suitable for weddings and Bar Mitzvahs. What had originally gained traction through small clubs and tape trading was no longer the property of the subculture responsible for its inception, and, for an army of socially disenfranchised heavy metal fans, nothing could be worse than having one of their beacons stolen from them in the name of big business. For a genre that had always championed individuality and anti-establishment rhetoric, the reality of Metallica joining forces with Bob Rock to create something palatable for the masses was the equivalent of President George H.W. Bush halting the Gulf War to admit that Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein wasnt such a bad guy after all. You may find that last line a bit hyperbolic, but Ive interviewed plenty of diehard metalheads for whom such a comparison couldnt be more appropriate. As sociologist Deena Weinstein states, heavy metal includes at its minimum a code of sonic requirements to complete the transaction between artist and fan, so anything that is deemed, accurately or not, to fall short of those requirements is met with the most intense derision imaginable. Thats how it is with heavy metal fans. Everything is black and white, and nothing is easy to reconcile once the collective mind has been made up. They love you one minute and want to steamroll your records into the pavement the next. In Metallicas case, the obstinate fans they lost with The Black Album were replaced by a whole new demographic of listeners, many of whom hadnt sampled a lick of Kirk Hammetts guitar until Enter Sandman assumed control of the airwaves. Predominantly male audiences clad in ripped jeans and pitch black t-shirts gave way to mixed crowds wearing a variety of clothing never before witnessed at shows where mosh pits were the norm. As my grandfather used to ask, what does all this mean? Well, whether you love or hate The Black Album, you cant deny its significance within the framework of Metallicas development as a group. Bob Rock put them through the wringer for the purpose of crafting this epic collection of songs, and, when you listen to the production on Sad But True, The Unforgiven, or Nothing Else Matters, its obvious where all that extra money went. During the Thrash segment of Sam Dunns Vh1 Classic documentary Metal Evolution, drummer Lars Ulrich iterates how badly the band needed to change things up for the sake of their own sanity, which, given how avidly articulate he is, is hard to argue with when the totality of the bands circumstances is taken into account. The Black Album told us everything we needed to know about where Metallica was heading and why they needed to go there, so the multi-millionaire complacency theyve settled into ever since shouldnt be shocking to anyone with their finger on the pulse of heavy metal. While Metallica has become a touring juggernaut through the years, their studio output hasnt come close to living up to the promise of their first three masterpieces featuring original bassist Cliff Burton. Musically, lyrically, and stylistically, they were never the same again. What follows is my personal ranking of the bands studio output since 1991 from worst to best. As always, generating meaningful discussion is the endgame here, so dont be shy when it comes to letting your voice be heard.