I thought he meant it. I don't know why he would do it. It was just my thought: 'He's meant that'. "I've told him that. I've said it to his face. I don't want to go into what he said. "Do you know what? Ninety-nine per cent of managers would love to do it. "I embarrassed Mike Williamson and I embarrassed myself, but I still believe I did it for the right reasons and I embarrassed him into performing the next time he played. "I apologised to Mike for going public. I had to go and find him to go through it."
Although Carver accepts he was wrong for accusing Williamson publicly and that he apologised to the centre-back, the fact he believes his comments were made "for the right reasons" shows exactly why Newcastle were right to sack him. Regardless of whether or not Carver's comments were made with the best intentions, the fact he thought that it was acceptable as a head coach of a Premier League football club to make such remarks proves he does not have the temperament to be a top-flight manager. There is a difference between attempting to get a reaction from a player and unjustifiably tarnishing his character - and that's what Carver did to Williamson, even if the defender's two bookings were ludicrous at the King Power Stadium.
NUFC editor for WhatCulture.com/NUFC. History graduate (University of Edinburgh) and NCTJ-trained journalist. I love sports, hopelessly following Newcastle United and Newcastle Falcons. My pastimes include watching and attending sports matches religiously, reading spy books and sampling ales.