10 Things Everyone Always Gets Wrong About The Walking Dead

7. "The Early Seasons Were Better"

The Walking Dead Season 1 Rick
AMC

As The Walking Dead has waned in popularity, fans have begun pining for a return to the "good ol' days" of the earlier seasons, seemingly forgetting those initial years weren't actually all that much better.

The show has been hit and miss since its inception, with the stellar first season being followed up by the dreadful slog that was season 2. Even then, while season 3 was a return to form, the back half once again descended into inanity, resulting in one of the most disappointing season finales in the programme's history (and that's saying something).

Of course there have always been good runs in between the bad stuff, and admittedly some of the strongest storylines were found in seasons 1, 4 and 5, but the consistency hasn't dropped that much in recent years.

It's easy to look back on the show's history through rose-tinted glasses and forget that the complaints fans have now are almost identical to the ones they had nearly eight years ago, but the harsh reality is the show has always been this inconsistent.

Advertisement
Contributor

Josh has over 11 years of experience as a published writer, having worked nine of those years as a full-time content producer at WhatCulture. In that period he has created hundreds of articles, videos and podcast episodes for multiple WhatCulture channels, specialising in gaming, horror and film & TV. He now primarily works as a senior content producer and presenter on WhatCulture Gaming where he co-hosts the WhatCulture Gaming Podcast, a top 3 UK most listened to gaming podcast that he co-created in 2018. Over the years he has reviewed several high-profile gaming releases, covered industry events with on-site reporting, opined on breaking news, and even kicked off his interviewing career by chatting to childhood hero, Tommy Wiseau.