Game Of Thrones: 5 Plot Contrivances In A Song of Ice And Fire That Were Passed Off As Realism

opener We are now less than a week from the premiere of Season 3 of Game of Thrones, HBO€™s popular adaptation of George R.R. Martin€™s epic fantasy novel series, A Song of Ice and Fire. Set in the fictional€”but vaguely recognizable--realm of Westeros, Martin€™s books tell of the struggle for control of the land, and are full of well-written characters and compelling political intrigue. They are also pretty realistic, as much as a fantasy series can be. They present the brutality of medieval society, and the plot is full of unexpected with sudden, surprising deaths. And while there€™s a role for magic, it€™s more as an increasingly powerful outside force than a tool for the characters to use. What€™s more, we€™re supposed to accept the frustrating death of a beloved character that leaves us no one to root for in the story as this is what often happens in real history; death is usually sudden and pointless (just look up how Frederick Barbarossa died). If we don€™t like it, then we must not be getting it. But my problem is not with the unexpected deaths or twists, but how they happen. They often occur through some sort of deus ex machina magical means, or through normal€”but rather contrived-feeling€”events. It often comes off like Martin wrote himself into an impasse, or wanted to play with readers€™ emotions, and had to come up with a convenient way to kill a character. So here are five parts of A Song of Ice and Fire that supposedly lend to its realism but€”in my opinion€”come off as plot contrivances. It is with a heavy heart that I lay these out, as I still love Martin€™s work. But it must be said. Note: I will indicate which of these are spoilers if you€™ve only been watching the TV series.
Contributor
Contributor

Peter Henne hasn't written a bio just yet, but if they had... it would appear here.