10 Problematic WWE Storylines That Have Aged HORRIBLY

Time heals SOME wounds, but not gaping ones left behind by WWE's worst excesses.

Real Americans
WWE

A recent lawsuit filed against WWE by ex-writer Britney Abrahams alleged a number of damning practices including-but-not-limited-to storylines riddled with discrimination and offensive stereotypes.

It was the latest story to emerge out of the wrestling industry that could be classified as shocking without being surprising. Decades of characters and stories espousing lowest common denominator values for cheap heat, even cheaper pops and moderate tickets sales have been staples of just about every mainstream organisation, not least because they've been shared by the market leader.

Vince McMahon's personal, social and political beliefs might once have been thinly-disguised before he well and truly dove headfirst up his own backside post-2001, but even before that, wrestling wasn't exactly whip-smart with its subtext. Jingoism sold, sexism, racism and ableism were overlooked if they were an easy routes for babyfaces (or a booker!) to take,

Of course, all of these events are from the dim and distant past, and definitely not between 1998 and 2017, and that's discounting the aforementioned lawsuit cases that are as recent as 2020.

Tl;dr - wrestling is as gross as it ever was, don't let anybody tell you otherwise, and here's some proof...

10. Jinder Mahal's Ugly War Of Words With Shinsuke Nakamura

Real Americans
WWE.com

There was just something so needlessly defensive about Jinder Mahal's racist micro-aggressions towards Shinsuke Nakamura back in 2017.

The WWE Champion was flopping hard in the role, but naturally had to go out there every week and act as if this extended and warped troll-job was in fact going swimmingly. That we were all supposed to be bored rigid, that we were supposed to lose interest in the top of the card completely, that we were supposed to be booing the bigot. Bruce Prichard wasn't back with WWE at that point, but it smacks of a storyline he'd defend on his podcast as serving its purpose because fans didn't like Jinder while nakedly ignoring the fact that maybe people just didn't like barely coded hate speech and there are substantially different kinds of dislike anyway.

'The Modern Day Maharaja' mocked the way Nakamura spoke and looked, then retained the WWE Championship against him in consecutive pay-per-view matches that stunk. Zero sense of good prevailing over evil, and barely any sense that either man was even really fighting for a cause. It was the worst of times - a creative machine (barely) running on fumes and two walking and talking props unable to push the heap of junk up a hill.

Contributor
Contributor

Michael is a writer, editor, podcaster and presenter for WhatCulture Wrestling, and has been with the organisation over 7 years. He primarily produces written, audio and video content on WWE and AEW, but also provides knowledge and insights on all aspects of the wrestling industry thanks to a passion for it dating back over 30 years. As one third of "The Dadley Boyz", Michael has contributed to the huge rise in popularity of the WhatCulture Wrestling Podcast, earning it top spot in the UK's wrestling podcast charts with well over 50,000,000 total downloads. He has been featured as a wrestling analyst for the Tampa Bay Times and Sports Guys Talking Wrestling, and has covered milestone events in New York, Dallas, Las Vegas, London and Cardiff. Michael's background in media stretches beyond wrestling coverage, with a degree in Journalism from the University Of Sunderland (2:1) and a series of published articles in sports, music and culture magazines The Crack, A Love Supreme and Pilot. When not offering his voice up for daily wrestling podcasts, he can be found losing it singing far too loud watching his favourite bands play live. Follow him on X/Twitter - @MichaelHamflett