10 Reasons Wrestling Will Never Ever Top The 90s
7. There Was Little Enough For It To Resonate
Wrestling used to be appointment television. American viewers gathered around the TV on Monday nights. Their British counterparts had to wait until Friday to catch both RAW and Nitro - oddly, the ratings war began anew across the pond days later - but it didn't matter. The internet hadn't yet dominated the landscape.
Ironically, on that wrestling landscape, dominated by mummies masquerading at yetis, less was more. The aching six day gap allowed fans to approach the next shows with intrigue, rather than fatigue. Now, in 2017, WWE presents five hours of television and ceaseless original content. It's not as if WWE programming is too complex or convoluted to keep up with, but the model practically guarantees that it cannot be as exciting or unique as it was when output was more streamlined.
There's only a finite number of combinations of wrestlers to run through. Rematches are inevitable. The schedule has bloated in parallel with the dimming of star power, which doesn't help. WWE has to pit name guys against each other to compensate for the lack of genuine, established headliners.
It's a paradox from which there is no escape, and the circle spins with such speed that recycling is a natural consequence.