10 Ways WWE Is Killing WrestleMania
6. It Is Mythologising Itself
WrestleMania has created a certain expectation in the minds of fans - and its generic conventions are stifling its quality.
There has to be at least two epic matches. Longer is better and more important, even if certain matches cannot withstand the additional weight. Last year, The Undertaker and Shane McMahon wrestled for thirty minutes for no discernible reason other than it was WrestleMania. It was epic for epic's sake.
Even the best match in Orlando, Triple H Vs. Seth Rollins, could have benefitted from being that bit shorter. It felt like a self-consciously "big WWE match" when it should have felt more urgent, more organic. It was a **** match, performed brilliantly - but it was almost stipulated to be something bigger than the intimate rivalry cried out for. It was more of a great war than the personal battle it was built as.
Seth Rollins entered into his best babyface performance yet, but the reception was fairly tepid until the last five minutes. He was also significantly less over than Finn Bálor and even Chris Jericho on RAW. Right down to the use of Metallica in the video package, it felt at times more like Triple H's trademark saga than Rollins' redemption.
Goldberg Vs. Brock Lesnar was among the best five minute matches ever wrestled, but it was of an aberration than anything else. The overarching mythology of 'Mania still pervaded everything.
Every year, the entrance has to be bigger, more spectacular, more epic. WWE spends more time designing the stage than it does promoting its players.
Shouldn't it be the other way around?