10 WWE Questions You Most Want Answered (Mar 1)

2. A Stipulation Adding To Sting Vs. Triple H

From @Freaksteil: What stipulation would you add to Sting/Triple H to make it matter in the long term?
The stipulation that WWE did at Survivor Series: If Triple H loses then he no longer gets to run WWE. The idea behind it can be that Sting doesn't like Hunter and wants to screw him out of his career. WWE needs to end this Authority storyline. They should have done it in November when they did it in the storylines. This is their chance to get it right again. I don't mind Hunter and Stephanie as performers, but it's time for them to step back to let the talent shine. They could even add to the story by saying that Sting ends up becoming the GM of WWE's shows if he wins the match. It gives him a reason to stick around without having to wrestle unless they need him for a big match. That depends on if he'd be willing to travel nearly every week and stuff like that, but if he does then it's not a bad way to change things up. As for a match stipulation, they probably don't need one. Doing a regular match is just fine. Sting's not that great in a brawling environment anyway.
Contributor
Contributor

John wrote at WhatCulture from December 2013 to December 2015. It was fun, but it's over for now. Follow him on Twitter @johnreport. You can also send an email to mrjohncanton@gmail.com with any questions or comments as well.