How WWE Has FINALLY Solved Its Babyface Problem
Morrison received a monster of a reaction at Money In The Bank, and Miz's betrayal of him on RAW the other week drew, by WWE standards, a massively sympathetic reaction. Both Riddle and Morrison draw "Awwww" noises from an audience that has forgotten what a pop feels like or doesn't care for what a pop sounds like. This article was pitched before Morrison was obliterated by Omos in two minutes on RAW, but wins and losses do not matter. In WWE, daft patter matters.
This is an audience that has been conditioned for years to receive the WWE babyface as a geek. When this is performed on purpose, it actually gets over. WWE has for years insisted on removing itself from the energy, soul and archetypes of traditional professional wrestling. Is this the final, improbably successful metamorphosis from professional wrestling to sports entertainment?
Do fans identify and sympathise with hapless nice guy geeks because WWE has embraced that which it can actually do? Seriously, no facetiousness here whatsoever this time: is this mode of storytelling, no matter how whacky, actually resonating with the audience because the audience can sense it's an earnest and organic expression of something that the creator can actually get on board with?
None of this is subjectively great, just to make that clear. But it's working, and it's preferable to that with which WWE was running off its audience.
CONT'D...(5 of 6)