Shane McMahon vs. The Undertaker: 9 Reasons We're Not Sure How To Feel

6. There's No Way Shane Will Win

Barring some added stipulation or an outright bait-and-switch, there is absolutely no way Shane McMahon defeats The Undertaker at WrestleMania. I understand that it's scripted, but can you imagine how absurd it would be looking back on the legacy of one of WWE's greatest stars and seeing that he went 23-2, with the only losses being to Brock Lesnar and Shane F*cking McMahon? WWE literally could have booked Shane against anyone else on the card - with the exception of the aforementioned Beast and the chosen one Roman Reigns - and it would have given us a more believable outcome. As it stands now there's a better chance that Abdullah The Butcher wrestles Charlie Sheen in a first blood match on the pre-show than there is Shane winning this match. Since the outcome is not in any way in doubt, it's going to be much more difficult to have the proper emotional investment in the match, especially because we know going in that it's not going to bring an end to the infinite Authority shenanigans that have been plaguing the show for years. Not only that, but...
Contributor
Contributor

Brad Hamilton is a writer, musician and marketer/social media manager from Atlanta, Georgia. He's an undefeated freestyle rap battle champion, spends too little time being productive and defines himself as the literary version of Brock Lesnar.