The Disturbing Truth Behind WWE Universal Title
It was now inextricably linked to the Beast's perception as an act-killing, show-killing mercenary, which WWE hardly helped, in 2018, by booking Lesnar as precisely that in a harebrained attempt to get Roman Reigns over as the lesser of two evils. "Why would I watch the show, Paul?" Lesnar said of RAW, which didn't much put over his title as something to wear with pride or arrogance, or as something to fight for. Roman fought to rescue the belt from the waist of a champion who didn't give a toss about it, not because it marked him, undisputedly, as the best. The narrative surrounding the title became tinged with meta desperation.
Lesnar reclaimed it almost immediately, following Roman's leukaemia diagnosis later that year. In a telling indication of just how much the stench had engulfed everything, Reigns won at SummerSlam 2018 by effectively tapping Lesnar on the shoulder and asking him to look "over there". Again, it was a bullsh*t finish, this time designed to hoodwink fans into cheering for Roman in shock. The Universal Title wasn't a prize to be won, because the victory meant nothing; it was something fans were desperate to see Lesnar lose, until wider apathy kicked in, and suddenly everything wasn't so urgent. WWE's continued TV woes illustrated that Lesnar holding the title didn't affect the quality of its output.
Seth Rollins had slain the Beast, by 2019, first through, yes, chicanery - the events of WrestleMania 35 were germane to the storyline, at least - and then cleanly in a blinding triumph at SummerSlam. It didn't resonate. That leads us to the Fiend, the now, and the weird, damning narrative that surrounded the belt by 2019.
CONT'D...(4 of 5)