The Unbelievable Truth Behind Wrestling Fan TRIBALISM
Commentary in AEW is very good but often lighthearted, running away with itself. Smug in-jokes Jones.
While he might reference STARDOM once a month or something, Michael Cole is still a phenomenally sterile, exposition-happy announce guy who either dryly recaps incredibly basic stories or overcompensates by screaming his head off. One company could do with a bit more focus, the other could do with being far more organic.
Moreover, beyond these differences, the other irony of WWE Vs. AEW tribalism is that each promotion does a lot of the same things. This isn't some Scorsese Vs. MCU divide. Both WWE and AEW go overboard with distraction and interference finishes. Both are guilty of taking forever to do anything of note with nothing character arcs, whether it's Triple H presenting Nikki Cross as an amnesiac or Kip Sabian standing around with a box on his head. Both rely on bad comedy. Both are millennial-brained entities that don't seem sure of which year it is, between Roderick Strong referencing The Waterboy (1998) or Jey Uso unaware that TikTok replaced Vine years ago. Both promote too many titles; does anybody need either the Heritage Cup or the ROH World TV title?
At times, the only true difference is the set of initials.
Obviously, you don't want both companies to operate identically, but the grand irony of tribalism within US mainstream wrestling is that each promotion would actually be better if they copied one another's homework to a degree.