WWE: 10 Things That Must Happen In The Undertaker Vs Brock Lesnar Feud

10. Have Brock Exert Total, Complete Dominance

Brock Lesnar This one is perhaps the most obvious thing to do, however same as a cliché must become a cliché for a reason, it is the most necessary. Undertaker is old. People can see it, people know it. Brock, on the other hand, is still in pristine fighting condition and has beaten, legitimately, others far more skilled than 'Taker in the past. This state of fact is already there for all to see and know, therefore, exaggerate it and leave no questions unanswered. In the past, for big Wresltemania matches, WWE tends to avoid too much physical contact between the combatants, instead preferring to incite you to pay to see them come to blows. The most you might get is a sneaky attack from the heel or a short brawl, soon thereafter disbanded by an army of podgy referees. With this match, I believe that approach is a mistake. I believe they should come to blows, repeatedly and Brock should win absolutely EVERY SINGLE TIME. However long it takes, whichever circumstances you wish to apply; weapons, no weapons; in the ring, backstage; a one-minute beat-down or a ten-minute beat-down, every time these two find their paths' crossing, Undertaker needs to be left down, broken and soundly, soundly beaten. It's not rocket science. It's the simplest thing to do- Occam's Razor in full effect: sometimes, the simplest solution is the right one.
Contributor
Contributor

Betting on being a brilliant brother to Bodhi since 2008 (-1 Asian Handicap). Find me @LiamJJohnson on Twitter where you might find some wonderful pearls of wisdom in a stout cocktail of profanity, football discussion and general musings. Or you might not. Depends how red my eyes are.