WWE Brand Split: 8 Reasons It Could Succeed Or Fail

1. Succeed: True Competition

Eddie Guerrero Rey Mysterio Smackdown 2004
WWE

During the previous brand split, Raw and SmackDown! were never truly 'competing'. For one, they were aired on different networks intended for different audiences, each accessible by a significantly different number of homes. Furthermore, whereas Raw was live, the taped nature of SmackDown! meant it could not avoid the disadvantage of leaked spoilers, further devaluing any reason to watch it.

Sure, for a period SmackDown! boasted some of the finest wrestling the company had ever produced, but there was still an upper limit to what the show could achieve in relation to Raw. With the two programmes now set for the same network, and both scheduled to air live, direct competition is now a realistic prospect. The only difference is the day on which they are broadcast.

Traditionally, WWE has excelled when it has a rival, and by manufacturing true competition for itself, both rosters should be motivated to prove which is the best in a genuine, direct ratings battle.

Editorial Team
Editorial Team

Benjamin was born in 1987, and is still not dead. He variously enjoys classical music, old-school adventure games (they're not dead), and walks on the beach (albeit short - asthma, you know). He's currently trying to compile a comprehensive history of video game music, yet denies accusations that he purposefully targets niche audiences. He's often wrong about these things.