WWE WrestleMania 30: 10 Reasons Cena Vs Wyatt Is A Terrible Idea

2. We'd Rather See The Undertaker vs John Cena

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCnDwMHEt5c I am admittedly stoked for Taker vs Lesnar. It should be a killer brawl with a guy who seems like a legitimate threat to the biggest prize in wrestling. As great as it will be, it's not the match I wanted to see at Wrestlemania 30. For me, the 30th anniversary of the Superbowl of sports entertainment should always have been headlined with The Deadman taking on John Cena. I understand the logic behind waiting. There's only a few real dream matches left on the WWE roster for The Undertaker. Lesner is one, Sting is another, but the greatest of them is Cena. As I said, Lesnar is an awesome opponent. He has the reputation to create real drama and the two have history. Sting on the other hand would create the most amazing spectacle. Admittedly the match probably wouldn't be on the same level as five years ago, but seeing those two icons staring each other down would be a 'mania moment like no other. But Cena is special. He's the only guy who I sincerely think might actually break the streak. Don't get me wrong. I hope to jebus he doesn't, but nothing in wrestling would raise my pulse like an AA nearfall on Taker. So where's the logic in using Lesnar? Well, Cena is likely to be around for the next ten years, whereas who knows with Lesnar. It seems like the safe bet but I'm not entirely convinced. Keep in mind The Undertaker is 48 with nearly three decades on the clock. Every match is a risk to him now. If I were WWE, I'd take this opportunity while it's still a sure thing.