Traditionally, the main event of WrestleMania is the one match that fans should be expected to get excited for. Think back to 'Mania X-Seven, when The Rock collided with Steve Austin, or even WrestleMania VI, when Hulk Hogan and The Ultimate Warrior met in a match dubbed 'The Ultimate Challenge'. Those were matches to build the entire pay-per-view around. Then, there's the other side of the coin. For example, which match from WrestleMania 13 do people remember most fondly, Steve Austin vs. Bret Hart or The Undertaker vs. Sycho Sid? Of course, it was the double turn, blood-soaked battle between Austin and Hart, yet that wasn't the main event on the show. Instead, 'Taker and Sid struggled to follow on from the wonderful antics of their peers. Fast forward to 2016, and it looks like the main event of WrestleMania 32 will similarly struggle to justify its positioning as the final bout on the card. WWE have been pushing hard to make Roman Reigns the promotion's top babyface, but it feels more than a little forced. There are worries that the pay-per-view could fizzle out rather than end with a bang. There's an argument to be made that Reigns vs. Triple H would be better served in a sub-main event slot, and this article explains exactly why.
