10 Predictions For The Future of Cinema

5. We Are Going To Get More And More Remakes And Franchises€

My love of film grew as a child through animation and horror. And it breaks my heart to see so many horror films that terrified me like 'Halloween', 'The Thing', 'The Omen', 'Nightmare on Elm Street' and fantastic Spanish and Asian fare like 'The Orphanage' and 'Ju-On' remade, and repackaged safely without a unique vision or any real terror- many of the great horror films are social commentaries on the time they are made, and if the remakes don€™t understand this and adapt suitably, then what the hell is the point in remaking it? However, franchises aren€™t necessarily a bad thing- I mean, Shakespeare practically invented the modern franchise with €˜The Hollow Crown€™, and the spin-off with €˜The Merry Wives of Windsor€™. I wouldn€™t be surprised if I€™ve missed out one of his plays that is technically a prequel or a €˜sidequel€™. I am actually a big supporter of franchises like Harry Potter, James Bond (perhaps less of a solid example considering the total lack of continuity), Toy Story and The Lord of The Rings where a saga is told, and in some cases we grow up with the characters in them and learn to love them. It means you don€™t have to cram everything into one film or tease sequels because you have time to tell your story and develop your characters. But I am incredibly cynical of films based on books when the rights are bought before publication, or they the books are split into two €œto make sure we don€™t leave anything out€. Everyone wants their own Harry Potter. How many failed attempts by suits desperate for some of that cash have we seen? 'Eragon', 'Stormbreaker', 'The Spiderwick Chronicles', 'The Seeker: The Dark is Rising'€ And a most repulsive term is thrown about by the suits now€ €œBrand Recognition€. It makes me sick to say it. That€™s why they remake horror films which they already cannibalised with inferior sequels, because people already know about it and they don€™t take risks. That€™s why they are adapting films based on Monopoly and Stretch Armstrong, for crying out loud! One thing I completely disagree with is the idea that big-name actors aren€™t a draw anymore, and that it€™s the brand behind a film that draws the punters. That simply isn€™t true- acotrs will always win out. They are the faces we see on screen, the characters who we go through the journey with and care about, not the friggin€™ €˜mythology€™ (Because the tales of Cybertron just make me go all misty-eyed€) In some cases, yes, people know what you€™re talking about when you say €œlet€™s see 'The Hunger Games'€, but I guarantee you €œthat new Leonardo DiCaprio movie€ will be more appealing to joe public than €œLet€™s see the movie based on a Ouija board€, which happens to star Leonardo DiCaprio (This is hypothetical, because Leo is clearly better than that€)
 
Posted On: 
Contributor
Contributor

Aspiring Director, Screenwriter and Actor. Film is my passion, but I indulge in TV, Theatre and Literature as well! Any comments or suggestions, please tweet me @IAmOscarHarding