The Dark Knight Rises: 20 Blunders in Chris Nolan’s Trilogy

2. The Al Ghul€™s

So eventually in TDKR, the Al Ghul€™s show up and it turns out the whole dastardly plot was their machination. In the blink of an eye we€™re suddenly expected to fully back them as the primary villains. Well hang on, I haven€™t seen or heard of Ra€™s Al Ghul since the first film, and Talia is completely new to the franchise. Would it not have helped to build them up in some way? Or at least foreshadow them throughout. But no, Nolan, the king of the reveal, just whips the carpet from under our feet and says €œRemember Bane? Well forget him now, I€™m just going to do him in later with a throwaway shot most of you will forget until you get the DVD gets released. These two are the proper villains€. Thanks for that chum, way to ruin Bane at the very last second. What€™s at work here is Nolan€™s desire to make a successful movie franchise, to close the story off so that it comes full circle. But it doesn€™t come full circle; it asks more questions than it answers. So in effect Nolan has created a story timeline that does come back on itself, sure, but it stops just short of making any truly poetic connections. It felt to me like he made so many unnecessary changes to the mythology that when it came time to tie them all up, he€™d lost track of half of them.
Contributor
Contributor

Stuart believes that the pen is mightier than the sword, but still he insists on using a keyboard.