Well, the 2013 Emmy nominations have been revealed and there were a lot of surprise nominations and a lot of surprise snubs. Instead of looking at the surprise nominations, I figure Id go the obvious route and look at the snubs. Now, I never get too upset with snubs and nominations, and stuff like that. It doesnt really ring important with me. However, I do think certain shows and performances deserve a little more recognition and a little boost to increase viewers and keep the shows afloat. Now, while Im not positive getting an Emmy nom helps your ratings, I couldnt imagine it would hurt them. I use to take the Emmys seriously. I use to think they meant something. After Jim Parsons beat Steve Carell twice, I just didnt feel like they meant anything. No disrespect to Parsons, I think he is great on BBT, but it is nothing compared to Carells portrayal of Michael Scott. I know its weird to think that one award, back to back years, made me change my entire mind on the Emmys and award shows in general, but it did. Im also going to come out and say that I dont watch a decent amount of the popular shows that get nominated. So for me to say that someone deserves to be nominated instead of someone from Game of Thrones or Mad Men, would be insane. Because I dont watch those shows I cant say who is or who isnt good on that program. These are just people that I think should have been nominated, also. Enough rambling, lets take a look at the snubs!
(SPOILERS AHEAD!)