2. Should Sav Get Away With Murder..?
Much like
Dexter, the show asks the question "Is it okay to murder someone?" Which, the answer is more often than not "no."
"But what if they really deserved it? Ah. It is hard to feel apathy for the villains who Sav kills off during the shows run, because of what they did to his partner. We, the viewers, feel like some sort of justice should be done, and depending on what side of the argument regarding capital punishment you sit on, some of us feel these people deserved to die, particularly when the law failed to catch up with them. When the show ended, Sav still had not been apprehended for his murders, and in effect "got away with it" which begs the question - Is this a good message for the BBC to send out? I personally feel that Sav, much like Dexter, should face some sort of justice in the end, and that's why we need a series 2.