10 Real Reasons Why Wrestling Fans Never Get What They Want
1. Two-Man Commentary Teams
The short answer is that Tony Khan, for whatever reason, likes a three-man booth - even though both Jim Ross and Taz are on record stating their disdain for the dynamic.
Khan in 2019 had an original vision for AEW that sought to add a distinct dynamic to the table. Excalibur was to provide play-by-play to match the fast-paced energy of the in-ring action, Jim Ross was there to add gravitas and authority and lend legitimacy to the upstart operation, while Alex Marvez was to play a historian role offering background context in a similar way to WCW's Mike Tenay or NJPW's Chris Charlton.
This didn't work because, bluntly, Marvez was not very good.
As such, he was replaced by Tony Schiavone, who provided a sense of warmth, enthusiasm and nostalgia. With Taz now on deck to drill into the technique and provide insight into strategy and why exactly holds are excruciating, the three-man booth is a good version of a flawed concept, at least.
Fans however for years have longed for a return to a more simple and coherent two-man booth, which is one of those ain't-broke fixtures that should never have went away. Triple H has returned to default in WWE, but AEW persists with the three-man booth and only doesn't on Collision because Jim Ross is on hiatus for health reasons.
Khan is also quite an excessive booker, and his vision for a three man booth is consistent with his general approach. He can keep track of it much like he and he alone could keep track of those old, convoluted Casino battle royales.
For Khan, more is often more, and this extends to commentary.