1. Triple H Versus Sting Is Ideally A Better Match From An In-Ring Standpoint Than Sting Versus The Undertaker
Sting wrestling The Undertaker would have been cool 10 years ago when Sting was 45 and The Undertaker was 39. Now, WWE would run the risk of putting two men with a combined age of 104 years old with two years of ring rust between them in the ring. No matter how you explain it, that's a terrible idea. At Wrestlemania XXX versus Brock Lesnar, The Undertaker appeared slightly labored in his movements. One more year away from the ring will not help that, and as well, though in great condition for a 50-plus year old man, Sting still wore t-shirts with his gear in TNA and definitely looked less-than impressive. Again, for a myriad of reasons, these two men wrestling each other may be the literal definition of something that is "bad for business." On the other hand, Triple H would come into this match in optimal cardiovascular and physical condition, likely with wind enough for two wrestlers to wrestle for 20 minutes or less. He's also still able to move around this ring in a manner that doesn't showcase advancing age and diminishing performance ability. Hunter more than complementing what possibly few physical gifts Sting may still bring to the table and selling big for his still-undeniable charisma would make this match an absolute must-see.