10 Very Bad WWE Ideas That Lasted For Years
4. Brand Warfare At Survivor Series
In 2016 - and this was still a painfully early 2000s-adjacent development - Shane and Stephanie McMahon oversaw SmackDown and RAW respectively as part of a faithful brand split.
Fighting on behalf of bosses in a bid to appease them, while still a dire worker bee mentality that makes the pro wrestler feel more like a put-upon admin assistant, at least made sense in 2016. The stakes were nonexistent beyond "attempting to subdue Stephanie's anger for a week or two," but there was a reason - a sh*tty reason - for the show to happen.
In time, and what an indictment of modern WWE this is, WWE took a thin premise and ruined it beyond recognition.
The colour of fabric alone magically compelled acts to invade the respective shows - on which certain wrestlers actually enjoyed more success a month prior - leading to hysterically contrived brawls fought for no purpose whatsoever.
Those t-shirts weren't emblazoned with the lamentable "Property of..." branding, but they might as well have been. No agency, no stakes, no nothing, except some "brand supremacy" marketing spiel that nobody cares about in September or December.
Even the top stars think it's a load of sh*te, but it's easy money, isn't it?