10 WrestleMania Statistics WWE Don’t Want You To Know
3. 1
If the preceding avalanche of snark wasn't enough, here's something you're really not going to like...at all!
In over 34 WrestleMania events, held in front of well over a million molten fans, as huge storylines converge into epic blowoff matches contested by the most over megastars in all of professional wrestling, just one match has earned a ***** rating from the venerable Dave Meltzer's Wrestling Observer - that being the revolutionary Intercontinental Title Ladder match between Shawn Michaels and Razor Ramon from 'Mania X.
The Undertaker Vs. Shawn Michaels at WrestleMania 25? ****3/4, though since Dave is still abused to this day because of that rating, if he could turn back time, he'd probably save himself the bother and give it five. Or maybe he'd go back and not Hot Or Not? Peyton Royce's breast implants. One of the two.
Kurt Angle Vs. Shawn Michaels at WrestleMania 21? ****3/4. Randy Savage Vs. Ricky Steamboat at WrestleMania III? ****1/2. Bret Hart Vs. Shawn Michaels at WrestleMania XII? ****1/4, incredibly. He must really like long stretches of absolutely nothing.
This isn't a thin excuse to put over New Japan Pro Wrestling, or anything like that - and WrestleMania is best enjoyed as an all-round spectacle - but in this specific age, match quality is paramount. Even WWE recognises this, and marketed AJ Styles Vs. Shinsuke Nakamura as an on-trend 'Dream Match'. Meltzer is more over than Eric Bischoff, post-83 Weeks. The sphere of influence has changed. If ALL IN and Double Or Nothing indicate anything, it's that ******* matches draw more than the antiquated Monday Night RAW.
WWE hasn't delivered a true, epic one-on-one clinic for a not inconsiderable number of years - and without somewhat fit and ready nostalgic superpowers ahead of 2019, what, other than the brand itself, is the selling point?
And is that brand itself in danger of faltering?