10 WWE Questions You Most Want Answered (April 12)

4. Brock Lesnar As Money In The Bank Winner?

From @andyclemo: The thought of Brock Lesnar participating and winning Money in the Bank makes me almost moist. Thoughts?

That's a bit too much info there, but it's an interesting thought! Most of the time WWE likes to say that the former champion gets a rematch to win back their title. However, they could say that Lesnar was suspended and because of that he loses his right. Putting Lesnar in a match like that where there's six or seven other guys out there with ladders available as weapons could be a lot of fun. They could book it in a way where he absolutely destroys everybody in his path and is the most dominant MITB winner ever. They could also do the match and have Lesnar lose because Rollins or somebody else attacks. It's a good way to get heat on whoever attacked Lesnar since Lesnar is a babyface. It would be better if they didn't do that Money in the Bank idea with Lesnar, though. That briefcase is better when it belongs to an up and coming superstar whether it was CM Punk, Daniel Bryan, Dolph Ziggler or Seth Rollins last year. A guy like Lesnar really doesn't need it just like when John Cena won it, which seemed like a waste. The assumption is that Lesnar will work four PPV matches. We can pencil in SummerSlam, Royal Rumble and WrestleMania 32. Other than that he needs one more PPV. It could be Money in the Bank, but at this point we really don't know.