7 Traps WWE’s Brand Extension Has Fallen Into (Again)

6. Diluted World Title Picture

The Undertaker Smackdown
WWE.com

WWE made the decision to unify the WWE Title and World Heavyweight Championship back at TLC 2013. Although this meant that the company only had one 'World Title' for the first time since 2002, it hasn't taken WWE long to go back to the idea of presenting two top championships, one for each major show.

The actual naming of the WWE Universal Title was panned by many on social media, but the title has provided highlights on pay-per-view. Mainly, that's down to the fact that Kevin Owens has been a riot in his role as the deluded heel champion; KO has had awesome matches with the likes of Roman Reigns and Seth Rollins, even pulling something worthwhile from Braun Strowman recently too.

Despite the effort Owens has put forth, it still seems forced to have more than one World Title in your promotion. Which one is most important, the one on Monday nights or the one fans see each Tuesday?

This was a problem back during the first brand extension too, and it's hard to ignore the fact WWE are trying to portray a new title as immediately comparable to one they've spent years telling us is the most important.

Contributor

Lifelong wrestling, video game, music and sports obsessive who has been writing about his passions since childhood. Jamie started writing for WhatCulture in 2013, and has contributed thousands of articles and YouTube videos since then. He cut his teeth penning published pieces for top UK and European wrestling read Fighting Spirit Magazine (FSM), and also has extensive experience working within the wrestling biz as a manager and commentator for promotions like ICW on WWE Network and WCPW/Defiant since 2010. Further, Jamie also hosted the old Ministry Of Slam podcast, and has interviewed everyone from Steve Austin and Shawn Michaels to Bret Hart and Trish Stratus.