8 Big Concerns Heading Into WWE Hell In A Cell 2017

1. The PG Problem

Shane McMahon Kevin Owens Hell In A Cell
WWE.com

While WWE's PG rating has been a clear net positive for the company as a whole, its detrimental effect on shows like Hell In A Cell can't be denied. PG's restrictions have completely destroyed the danger and violence that formed the stipulation's appeal in the first place, reducing bouts like last year's match between Rusev and Roman Reigns to 'Mild Peril In A Cell.'

WWE are promising something they can't deliver on Sunday night. These matches won't be "hell," but standard one-on-one contests within the needless confines of a big steel structure, with a potential Shane McMahon dive the only notable exception. They'll be watered down, diluted, and homogenised, and while The Usos vs. New Day will still rule regardless, there'll be an element of disappointment regardless.

The company are better off without "extreme" stipulations in 2017, as they simply can't live up to the standards set in previous eras. Their obsession with gimmick pay-per-views means they'll never abandon them, though. WWE's identity crisis will continue, and while nobody's calling for a return to the days of Mankind's needlessly dangerous war with The Undertaker, these bouts will continue to leave the audience frustrated.

Channel Manager
Channel Manager

Andy has been with WhatCulture for eight years and is currently WhatCulture's Wrestling Channel Manager. A writer, presenter, and editor with 10+ years of experience in online media, he has been a sponge for all wrestling knowledge since playing an old Royal Rumble 1992 VHS to ruin in his childhood. Having previously worked for Bleacher Report, Andy specialises in short and long-form writing, video presenting, voiceover acting, and editing, all characterised by expert wrestling knowledge and commentary. Andy is as much a fan of 1985 Jim Crockett Promotions as he is present-day AEW and WWE - just don't make him choose between the two.