This is tough because Rollins vs. Ambrose should probably be a singles match, but Orton is without a feud right now. If Roman Reigns was healthy they likely would have Reigns vs. Orton again or maybe even a tag match. Since Reigns is out, Orton getting involved here makes a lot of sense. Think about it from a storyline perspective. If The Authority really hates Ambrose and doesn't want him to get his hands on Rollins, would they allow him to have a singles match with him? No. Putting Orton in there with them makes it come off like a 2 on 1 handicap match since there are two Authority guys in the match. They could sweeten the pot by saying the winner gets a WWE Title match or even have Rollins put the briefcase on the line. That's not something I would particularly like because I don't think the briefcase should ever be defended. It's not a title. The guy that won it should be the only one that is able to use it. He shouldn't have to defend it too. If WWE wanted to just do Rollins vs. Ambrose then that would be great. The problem is, what happens with Orton? He needs to have a role. It's unrealistic to think he wouldn't be on the card in some way. That's why a triple threat makes sense. Ambrose emerging as the winner would really put him over. Rollins getting the win could work well too.
John wrote at WhatCulture from December 2013 to December 2015. It was fun, but it's over for now. Follow him on Twitter @johnreport. You can also send an email to mrjohncanton@gmail.com with any questions or comments as well.
