Royal Rumble By The Numbers WWE DON'T Want You To Know
1. 55.5%
Since 1993, the winner of the Royal Rumble match has been stipulated to challenge for the WWF/WWE/World Heavyweight/Universal/RAW Women's/SmackDown Women's Title on the Grandest Stage - to, per company rhetoric, "main event WrestleMania".
We've seen 27 Rumble matches since this lasting stipulation took hold - 2016's iteration did see the winner involved in the last match, just not in the challenger's role - but only 15 of those men and women went on to close the Show of Shows. So, as a percentage, the winner of the Royal Rumble match only headlines WrestleMania 55.5% of the time.
This, of course, is a largely modern development. The likes of Alberto Del Rio, Sheamus and Shinsuke Nakamura - hot-shotted office favourites and near-reluctant gestures, variously - were shunted down the card to make way for John Cena, The Rock, and Brock Lesnar, who were by clear default the real stars of the show. WWE in response has claimed to offer several "main event-worthy" 'Mania attractions - but if that were true, and each of those attractions were comparable in quality and intrigue, what difference does the running order matter?
Ultimately, per its own remit, the Royal Rumble match only really matters half of the time. There is more or less a 50/50 chance of a headline match happening for the heavily-rumoured likes of Seth Rollins and Charlotte Flair.
It's a sadly telling number in this era, no?