The Real Reason WWE Brought Back In Your House
TakeOver: In Your House is coming, beautiful graphics and all, to the WWE Network in front of no fans other than those watching at home, and the company will hope beyond hope this includes more than have been watching the weekly show. An offer of their over-the-top service for free shortly after the whole world went inside for a while was shrewd, and likely locked more viewers in front of the empty venue WrestleMania than they otherwise could have hoped to achieve. But this isn't translating to television.
Raw's numbers plunged to record lows following the 'Show Of Shows'. This is not unfamiliar territory anymore (the % drops for the red brand over the past decade have been stark and not in keeping with natural wastage, regardless of the changing face of the television landscape), but less than people than ever have chosen wrestling as their escape recently, despite there never being a greater need for the service they supposedly provide.
There have been rule-proving exceptions (a Raw heavily promoted with the major Becky Lynch announcement, the SmackDown where pro wrestlers Mandy Rose and Sonya Deville paid off a pro wrestling storyline with a pro wrestling match that drew some pro wrestling viewers...who knew?) but the graphs for all programming are pointing downwards, with NXT's looking all the more perilous thanks to their inability to gain real ground against the opposition.
CONT'D...