Why It's Time To FINALLY Kill The Worst Trope In Wrestling
2. Why The Jannetty Comparisons Are Lazy
The way that WWE and fans throw around the Jannetty term, it's done in a way that's supposed to lambast a performer as being an untalented wrestler who was only decent in a tag team due to the abilities of their partner. It's basically saying, "Marty Jannetty was the s**ts, was completely carried by his partner, and so too is Wrestler A of Generic Tag Team #1".
That statement, to borrow a word from the playbook of the late, great Mr. Perfect, is bogus.
Don't let the WWE narrative or online chatter fool you; Marty Jannetty was a phenomenal worker.
Jannetty was a fantastic in-ring talent before he ever teamed with Shawn Michaels, was a fantastic in-ring talent during his teaming with Michaels, and was a fantastic in-ring talent after his pairing with Shawn was over. A healthy Marty Jannetty was one of the very best, smoothest wrestlers in the then-WWF during his tenures with the company in the 1980s and '90s.
If you needed to get a great match out of a bang average wrestler, Marty was one of those talents - much like a Shawn Michaels or a Bret Hart - that WWF management could turn to. During their time together, the Rockers were absolutely equals in terms of wrestling talent and their ability to connect to the audience.
Of course Shawn Michaels completely ran with the ball and took himself to an entirely different level upon turning heel and embarking on the singles ranks in 1992, but Marty Jannetty likewise had the potential to be a genuine breakout babyface singles act following that split.