WWE Have ALREADY Broken Their "No Wrestling During Commercials" Rule

Last night's Miz vs. Elias clash continued during the break.

the miz elias
WWE.com

Yesterday's Monday Night Raw saw The Miz and Elias continue their ongoing rivalry in a 2-out-of-3 falls match, with 'The A-Lister' overcoming the former 'Drifter' 2-1, seemingly edging him closer to his real target: another bout with Shane McMahon.

In a move that should surprise absolutely nobody, WWE violated their own self-imposed "no wrestling during commercials" rule during this bout.

The company uploaded the following clip to Twitter last night:-

Advertisement

The rule was only put into place on the week commencing 17 June, with Vince McMahon seemingly deciding that he didn't want wrestlers battling while the show cut to ads on a whim. It has resulted in an abundance of unrealistic 2-out-of-3 falls bout and various match restarts on Raw and SmackDown, but now, after just two weeks, it looks like the Chairman has binned the idea.

Advertisement

It's worth noting that Raw's other bouts adhered to the rule. Still, this is the same company that broke the Wild Card's "four invaders a night" stipulation on its very first evening, and ditched Raw's "darker, grittier" third hour after a couple of episodes too. Their lack of long-term planning has rarely been so apparent.

Channel Manager
Channel Manager

Andy has been with WhatCulture for six years and is currently WhatCulture's Senior Wrestling Reporter. A writer, presenter, and editor with 10+ years of experience in online media, he has been a sponge for all wrestling knowledge since playing an old Royal Rumble 1992 VHS to ruin in his childhood. Having previously worked for Bleacher Report, Andy specialises in short and long-form writing, video presenting, voiceover acting, and editing, all characterised by expert wrestling knowledge and commentary. Andy is as much a fan of 1985 Jim Crockett Promotions as he is present-day AEW and WWE - just don't make him choose between the two.