10 Fool-Proof Ways To Save The Terminator Franchise

6. Sort Out The CGI

One mystery we may never solve is how the Computer Generated Imagery in 2015€™s Terminator Genisys manages to look worse than the practical effects in 1984€™s The Terminator. Undoubtedly, though, it does. From Lee Byung-hun€™s T-1000 to Jason Clarke€™s T-3000 version of John Connor, none of the effects in Genisys ever feels like they could be real. CGI might be easier to produce nowadays, but that doesn€™t stop your giant mental pointy arms looking incredibly unbelievable. Bad CGI takes you out of a movie, and, considering that Paramount and Skydance also made the visually stunning J.J. Abrams Star Trek films, there really is no excuse here. Maybe they cut a corner and limited the CGI budget below reasonable expectations, or perhaps they simply hired the wrong effects expert. Either way, the film never makes you believe that a Terminator could really exist. The jaw-dropping effects in the original film were as important to its success as Arnie and James Cameron, and the naff ones here contribute just as much to Genisys€™ disappointment levels. Is it too much to ask that they embrace the older techniques instead next time around, and don€™t just rely on computers?
Contributor
Contributor

Film & TV journo. Quite tall.