10 Reasons Blair Witch Is A Crushing Disappointment

5. Too. Many. Cameras.

Blair Witch
Lionsgate

The original movie mined a lot of tension out of the fact that it was just three people getting lost in the woods with two cameras. There's a low-maintenance charm to it, and the fairly infrequent shift of perspectives made the viewer feel extremely immersed in what was going on.

Perhaps it's a comment on our ADD-addled culture that the new film features an absolute cr*p-tonne of cameras: there's one mounted on the ear of each camper, while some of them bring secondary cameras, and there's even a drone thrown in there for good measure.

While on one hand the ear-mounted cameras allow director Adam Wingard a lot of visual versatility, especially when the campers inevitably get separated, the constant perspective-shifting ultimately doesn't add much, and the addition of drones feels rather gimmicky and unnecessary.

The more pared-down thrills of the original are more effective, and in not fleeting so impatiently between cameras, the tension feels more sustained.

Contributor
Contributor

Stay at home dad who spends as much time teaching his kids the merits of Martin Scorsese as possible (against the missus' wishes). General video game, TV and film nut. Occasional sports fan. Full time loon.