Batman: Arkham Knight - 10 Ways The Season Of Infamy Is A Mixed Bag
3. Dissecting Batman's Morality Lacked Nuance
The culmination of the 'Shadow War' side-mission ends with Bruce having to make a choice: either cure a clearly physically and mentally ruined R'as, or destroy the life support he's dependent upon to survive. Why is this such a problem? Well, let me explain. The question is posed as a test of Batman's morality in that it asks to stretch his 'no killing' prerogative, but the ramifications of the question ultimately boil down to technical definitions of murder and whether or not you (the player) feel that destroying the machine presents a direct causal link between the act itself and Al Ghul's eventual death. Of course it doesn't, but I digress. What makes this so ineffective as an analysis of Batman's morals is that the logical argument is presented to the player quite immaculately by Alfred. R'as is the literal embodiment of the undead, and has been dying ever since he first bathed in the Lazarus pit. Each time he has returned he has done so more deranged, determined, and violent - a cycle perpetuated by Bruce's moral fallacies. R'as cannot be killed for he is already dead - this argument would have applied in Arkham City as well. The problem is exacerbated by the fact it is presented to us here - where R'as is clearly mentally and physically incapable of thought or action - and not in any prior engagement. This thus brings with it connotations of assisted dying and the moral debate surrounding that, but without getting too political the choice is plain and clear to be made. I've seen counterarguments from others urging players to save R'as under the belief that destroying the machine corrupts Batman's morals, but Rocksteady would never offer the choice of carrying out an action antithetical to the concept of the character itself, as this would be immersion-breaking and defy the point of the Arkham games altogether. Whilst it's an interesting premise to explore, it should've been given the appropriate time to do so.
WhatCulture's very own resident movie guy, Ewan has been working in the content creation biz for over 10 years now, having started as a freelance contributor to WhatCulture Gaming all the way back in 2015. After graduating with a First-Class Honours in History from Northumbria University in 2017 (where he won a prize for a totally killer dissertation on the Watergate years), Ewan took on the role of Comics Editor at WhatCulture and quickly developed WhatCulture Comics into one of the biggest superhero-focused channels on YouTube. He followed this with a brief hiatus at Screen Rant in 2021, where he worked across the Gaming and Film sections as a writer and editor, before returning to WhatCulture as a Senior Content Producer / Presenter in 2023. He started his own podcast, We Love Dad Movies, in 2022, and has contributed several written pieces to the Eisner-nominated comics website Shelfdust as well.
In his current role, Ewan incorporates his love of cinema, comic books, and history into written pieces and video essays for WhatCulture's Film & TV channel, as well as WhatCulture Gaming and WhatCulture Horror, with a particular focus on nineties-era Dad Movies, old school Westerns, and Golden Age Hollywood Noir. John Carpenter is his fave, and he thinks Batman Beyond should never have been cancelled. If that's your vibe, you'll probably like his stuff.