Doctor Who: 5 Unavoidable Arguments Against A Black Twelfth Doctor (And Why They're Wrong)

4. It€™s Tokenism!

eijofor who(bonus points if they can€™t correctly define tokenism to support this argument) Right off the bat, tokenism is:
€œthe practice of making only a perfunctory or symbolic effort to do a particular thing, especially by recruiting a smallnumber of people from under-represented groups in order to give the appearance of sexual or racial equality within a workforce€ €“ from oxforddictionary.com
Applied to the media rather than the workforce, tokenism becomes more apparent when characters from racial or sexual minorities are used as secondary, minor characters or one-shot characters in order to look like the effort of being inclusive is being made. Their appearances may be quite bland to avoid €˜stereotyping€™ or made to seem €˜exotic€™ and special. Therefore, Uhura and Sulu in the original Star Trek series are not tokens, Serena Southerlyn (who infamously came out as a lesbian in the last minute of her last Law and Order episode) was an attempt at tokenism, and the Token Black Guy of Not Another Teen Movie is a humorous attempt on a serious issue in the media. Making the Doctor black isn€™t a token. It would be a token if, when he regenerated, Eleven €˜tried on€™ several different bodies (ala Romana€™s first regeneration) and one of them was a black guy. Perhaps the Doctor would then say something along the lines of €˜This one feels good and equal to any other body, but maybe another day.€™ It would be a token if he regenerated into a black dude but regenerated again an episode later, back to someone white. So yeah, making the main character of one of the most successful shows change race isn€™t tokenism. It€™s overdue.
Contributor

I'm a 19 year old Arts student from Melbourne Australia, who finds it really awkward to write in third person. Other things I do awkwardly are watch TV and write far too much about fictional characters.