10 Biggest Omissions From WWE Draft List 2016

2. Corporate Kane

The Undertaker
WWE.com

The biggest question on everyone’s lips, though, has to be the one surrounding Corporate Kane.

Okay so that statement may not be 100% true, but with Demon Kane featuring elsewhere on the list, was there a reason they specifically avoided referencing his much-loved Corporate counterpart?

Could this be another tease relating to the soon-to-be-named General Managers? Possibly, but with Corporate Kane already being acknowledged as a former authority figure in recent skits, I wouldn’t have deemed that too likely.

Realistically, they probably just left him out because his masked alter-ego is accounted for instead. But why did they feel the need to make the differentiation between Demon Kane and straight-up, regular, run-of-the-mill Kane? After all, Demon Kane is the same as normal Kane, right?

Perhaps I’m just being pedantic, but to me it seems notable that they made the effort to purposefully address him as Demon Kane.

Contributor
Contributor

Elliott Binks hasn't written a bio just yet, but if they had... it would appear here.