2. Brock Or Taker?
Care to predict how this is going to go? Before SummerSlam, Undertaker had never beat Brock Lesnar in a televised one-on-one match. And immediately after SummerSlam, this rematch was slated for WrestleMania XXXII as a major draw, the final conflict between two warriors. Instead, it was rushed forward to a conclusion at Hell in a Cell. Interestingly (but not surprisingly), WWE has chosen to mostly ignore the fact that these two have faced off inside a cell before, with Brock defeating Taker in a bloody match. So in this battle between two part-time superstars, who will emerge victorious? Both men are reportedly finished with their 2015 appearances for WWE, so neither will be seen until the build to the Royal Rumble at the earliest. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcHeTWQ77bk In many ways, it makes more sense for Lesnar to win, because even though both men are part-timers, Brock will wrestle more often and could possibly be inserted into the Rumble (or at least compete at the PPV). Taker, on the other hand, will likely fade away until its time to ramp up for WrestleMania in his home state for what might very well be a retirement match. But logic and reasoning might go completely out the window when you consider that the final say falls to Vince McMahon, who might trust his gut more than what logic dictates.
Scott Carlson
Contributor
Scott is a former journalist and longtime wrestling fan who was smart enough to abandon WCW during the Monday Night Wars the same time as the Radicalz. He fondly remembers watching WrestleMania III, IV, V and VI and Saturday Night's Main Event, came back to wrestling during the Attitude Era, and has been a consumer of sports entertainment since then. He's written for WhatCulture for more than a decade, establishing the Ups and Downs articles for WWE Raw and WWE PPVs/PLEs and composing pieces on a variety of topics.
See more from
Scott