10 Ideas To Salvage WWE Survivor Series

8. Single-Brand Matches

Becky Lynch Survivor Series
WWE.com

It’s difficult to get invested in these Survivor Series matches for many reasons, but the lack of any coherent, reasonable conflict beyond “brand supremacy” is probably at the top of the list. There’s just no good reason for these teams to be fighting, other than it’s Raw versus SmackDown.

Now, imagine if you had Drew McIntyre and Randy Orton captaining respective teams as an extension of their ongoing feud. Maybe Elias joins Orton’s team, which then prompts Jeff Hardy to latch onto McIntyre’s squad. And so it would be as rivalries on Raw line up. Or even imagine the four-on-four match we saw between the Hurt Business and RETRIBUTION a few weeks ago was held back until Survivor Series, when their feud was parlayed into an elimination match.

Either of those options would give those matches meaning, far more than the “spectacle” of Raw and SmackDown’s “best of the best” going head-to-head. And it's been done before: the 2003, 2004 and 2010 Survivor Series PPVs took place during the brand extension, but still had single-brand elimination matches, including two Team Angles.

Contributor
Contributor

Scott is a former journalist and longtime wrestling fan who was smart enough to abandon WCW during the Monday Night Wars the same time as the Radicalz. He fondly remembers watching WrestleMania III, IV, V and VI and Saturday Night's Main Event, came back to wrestling during the Attitude Era, and has been a consumer of sports entertainment since then. He's written for WhatCulture for more than a decade, establishing the Ups and Downs articles for WWE Raw and WWE PPVs/PLEs and composing pieces on a variety of topics.