10 Reasons Why WWE SmackDown Is Better Than Raw

2. It's Two Hours Long

AJ Styles Dean Ambrose
WWE.com

At this point, complaining about Raw being three hours long is like beating a dead horse - nevertheless, it's still a major reason why Monday's show is just so difficult to get through. There's no way to change it - WWE gets a ton of money from the USA Network to air Raw and SmackDown, and the extra hour of Raw alone accounts for another $50 million a year. Given that in 2015, WWE made a $25 million profit overall, odds are they don't want to lose that $50 million.

So Raw's not getting shorter as long as USA is willing to pay extra for it. SmackDown, meanwhile, benefits from only being two hours long. During WWE's glory days, Raw was a trim two hours, and the pacing of SmackDown typically feels even better than those Raws. Usually, there's a long main event, a good focus on in-ring action, and a couple of effective non-wrestling segments.

SmackDown's length also has the benefit of keeping the crowd hot. Typically, Raw crowds are dead after an hour, knowing they've still got a long way to go. SmackDown crowds, on the other hand, are able to stay loud for the entire broadcast. It helps give the show a better feel overall.

Contributor
Contributor

Scott Fried is a Slammy Award-winning* writer living and working in New York City. He has been following/writing about professional wrestling for many years and is a graduate of Lance Storm's Storm Wrestling Academy. Follow him on Twitter at https://twitter.com/scottfried. *Best Crowd of the Year, 2013